ITSM - From Theory To RealityBy Michael Cardinal One of the biggest challenges in today's business is turning visions, strategies and ideas into a tangible reality that produces actual results. Many times people cannot effectively bridge the gap between what they desire and what is possible because those people perceive the gap to be too large.
One of the biggest challenges in today's business is turning visions, strategies and ideas into a tangible reality that produces actual results. Many times people cannot effectively bridge the gap between what they desire and what is possible because those people perceive the gap to be too large.
Service Management best practices have been captured in a framework and a library of books (the Information Technology Infrastructure Library-ITIL). On the surface, the framework and library provide the guidance needed to effectively, efficiently and economically manage an IT department. However, a deeper look reveals that the framework and library provide more than guidance, it also makes available actual steps to bridge the gap between "theory" and "reality."
- "If we don't change the direction we're going, we're going to end up where we're headed." - Chinese Proverb
- "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark." - Michelangelo
- How does IT turn theory and vision into reality?
- How does IT provide better quality, higher levels of service and become a profit center instead of a cost center?
- How does IT set about achieving the "higher mark" referred to by Michelangelo?
History has shown that what is needed to turn theory into reality is "action." Shortly after World War II, W. Edwards Deming, Joseph Juran and a number of other proponents of quality systems traveled to Japan as part of the rebuilding effort. Their theories and ideas had met indifference and even outright resistance in the United States.
The Japanese, however, embraced their ideas. The business leaders became "students," attending lectures, seminars and learning the theories proposed by Deming and Juran. Within four years, without any hard proof that the theories actually worked, those same "students" implemented the ideas of Total Quality Management.
The Japanese were able to do this because they took action on the theories. They viewed Deming's theories as the basis for moving their economy forward. The Japanese realized it would not be perfect and would require adjustment. But the key was that they did not wait until quality came to them, they took the first step and went about obtaining what it would take to implement quality.
The key barrier to IT turning theory into reality is a willingness to do whatever it takes (no matter how complex, painful, expensive, time consuming or different) to make the theory real. Albert Einstein once said: "If the facts do not fit the theory, change the facts." The Japanese demonstrated this by embracing Total Quality Management theory and adjusting their economy to the theory.
If IT departments truly desire to achieve a higher standard, they must be willing to "change the facts" to move towards more effective, efficient and economical management of people, processes, and technology. Changing the facts will require doing things differently, applying resources more in some areas and less in others, and moving away from the status quo and standard operating procedures of the last thirty years.
During the past five years, many IT departments have come under fire for failing to meet the needs of their customers and users. How can these IT departments better satisfy the desires of their customers and users?
For many organizations around the world the set of best practice processes and approaches described in the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) provides the answer. This methodology set contains processes and suggestions for effectively monitoring, managing and maintaining the resources under the control of IT leadership that they use to meet the needs of customers.
For those organizations that struggle to define the processes, the ITIL books themselves contain simple or generic process flows, terminology and information that can be implemented in their simple forms.
In particular the Service Support book contains all the information necessary to implement basic support of delivered services. For example, a complete Change Management process is provided in a process flow format. Service Delivery provides all the steps of an effective Service Level Management process. These processes are simple, straightforward and can be used quite effectively "straight out of the box."
The books also provide a greater level of granularity in the form of "procedures" or "tasks" that need to be accomplished as part of several processes. An example would be the sections needed in a Service Level Agreement as provided in the Service Delivery book. Other examples include costing models for Financial Management and the proposed structures for a Configuration Management Database (CMDB).
Even given these kinds of details, critics say they cannot implement ITIL based on their opinions that the books do not contain complete step-by-step instructions for successful implementation. This argument can be proven false by "adopting and adapting" ITIL.
The idea of "adopt and adapt" proposes that you use the basic process as a starting point for developing or customizing procedures and tasks that suit your own environment. Over time more detail or customization can be added or removed as needed. By using this approach you maintain some measure of standardization at a high level while customizing the processes at a more granular and detailed level.
An example of "adopt and adapt" is the creation of a Change Advisory Board (CAB). ITIL suggests that you create a CAB to approve and manage Changes. In a large organization a single CAB may not be feasible or efficient. An organization can put several CABs (perhaps one per service) in place under an umbrella group that coordinates and manages the lower level CABs. In this way you have not violated the high level best practice, but have put a practical, adapted solution in place.