Home    ITIL  Index

6 Steps Improved Service Quality

Let your staff do what they already do, writes ITSM Watch columnist Hank Marquis of itSM Solutions.
Aug 31, 2006
By

Hank Marquis





The No.1 reason for IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) adoption according to a recent Evergreen Systems report is to improve service quality.

Reports by various industry analysts claim that about 80% of service desk calls result from change-related failures self-inflicted by IT.

Since most service desk calls result from failed changes, the largest impediment to service quality is the IT department itself. IT is its own worst enemy, and is the No.1 preventable cause of IT service outages.

Many consultants advise adopting formal change management (CM) processes as a solution to this common IT organizational problem, explaining why one of the most common starting points for ITIL adoption is change management.

The goal of ITIL CM is “To ensure that standardized methods and procedures are used for efficient and prompt handling of all Changes, in order to minimize the impact of Change-related Incidents upon service quality, and consequently to improve the day-to-day operations of the organization.”

While many templates and examples exist to ease implementation of CM, few realize how hard it is to actually achieve the tight control required. In most organizations, staff is lean and formal CM is added work.

This is why most staff within IT dislikes CM—they feel it just gets in the way of what they know they need to do. There is merit in their feelings, as the very first potential problem described in the ITIL is how an over-bureaucratic process can diminish process effectiveness.

An IT organization improves service quality through CM without becoming overly bureaucratic by realizing what few consultants ever mention: that CM has two purposes: 1) limit change-related incidents, and 2) improve the efficiency and effectiveness of day-to-day operations.

The second purpose is what most consultants forget, and the result is often a process rightly perceived by staff as bureaucratic, unrealistic, and useable.

Most realize that slowing down and reviewing change requests results in better planning and implementation that, in turn, reduces failed changes. But the time required for this review and planning is often missing.

To gain more time, the CM system must handle fewer change requests. The trick is to split requests into two broad types: those that need approval (change requests) and those with pre-approval (service requests).

Standard Change

Change requests require centralized approval and formal CM process review and control. Service requests are de-centralized, pushed as far down as possible, and performed by the lowest possible level within the organization.

The secret is the little known standard change. ITIL describes a standard change as “ ... a change to the infrastructure that follows an established path, is relatively common, and is the accepted solution to a specific requirement or set of requirements.”

In other words, the generally accepted response to a service request is a standard change, not a change request.

Implementing a collection of pre-approved standard changes for the most common service requests can improve efficiency and effectiveness of staff, resulting in fewer change requests needing formal CM. It can also make IT staff more content and empowered.

The idea is powerful and simple: allow qualified staff to perform routine changes without going through the CM process.

Such changes require formal documentation and preparation of a procedure for action determination, execution, reporting, and control. The following example helps make clear the purpose and benefits of standard changes.

A user requests installation a new software application. Without any form of CM, IT installs the software without researching any potential issues. Then, after installation, the user starts having issues with a pre-existing application.

Over time, the normal response by IT is to disallow any new software installations without a change request and formal CM review. This is the safe bet, and will reduce occurrence of such issues, however, it is very inefficient because the user has to wait longer; IT Staff has to complete and process more paperwork; and CM gets bogged down with many change requests.


    1 2 >> Last Page


Comments  (click to add your comment)

Comments

    Name or nickname

    Email address

    Website

    Write comment
    You have characters left. (Maximum characters: 1200).

     


    IT Management Daily Newsletter




    Related Articles

    Most Popular