How Software Vendors Lie About ITIL SupportIt may not be a bold-faced; more of the white or, in this case, grey variety, writes ITSM Watch columnist Rob England.
Here is a thought experiment. Apparently Google and other high-tech employers are in a bit of a chef warcompeting to see who has the best staff cafeteria(s) with the best chef(s). Suppose that the ABC Staff Kitchen Handbook became the accepted standard for how to run elite company cafeterias, and staff advertisements started mentioning "ABC compliant cafeteria". But there is no formal standard by which to measure ABC compliance (this is a rare state of affairs but I can think of one other instance where it has happened: ITIL, of course).
So, what happens if the self indulgent Gen X/Gen Z employees decide that ABC compliance is a real selling point for a prospective employer, and companies scramble to get their cafeteria up to scratch? Suddenly, vendors pop up everywhere with ABC compliant products. Miracle Cutlery company touts how their knives help a kitchen achieve ABC. ZipZap Floor Cleaneras used in the best ABC kitchens! The Whizzer Garlic Sliceressential equipment for all ABC chefs. The Frosty Refrigerator Monitor supports six different ABC processes. MacCreedy's Frozen Carrotsdelivering ABC. You get the idea.
Now none of these claims are untrue but they are stretching the point somewhat. Even a cash register manufacturer or a refrigerated display cabinet company would be stretching the point to suggest that their product is delivering ABC kitchen processes. And yet some software manufacturers get upset if one suggests they do just this with ITIL.
But they do. I've done it
"This RFP wants ITIL Financial Management.
Quick, how do we support Financial Management?"
"Asset Whizz stores the supplier name and purchase cost, so say it does."
Who's going to prove you wrong? In fact, you're not wrong. Just as a hair is indeed one part of an elephant, so Asset Whizz is one part of FM. Not a very important part, but a part. Not a part that actually manages or supports or automates or delivers the ITIL defined FM process, just a source or store of data, but a part nonetheless. Just. Kinda.
So it is, to varying degrees of point-stretchieness with so many products that claim to "deliver" or "support" or "monitor" ITIL. A Service Desk tool (Incident, Request, Problem, Change, Release, Asset) is nearly indispensable for ITIL (though Post-It notes work, if badly).
A Service Level Management (SLM) system (meaning Service Level Agreement (SLA) definition, tracking, measurement, alerting and reporting) is very useful. Project Portfolio systems are great for those venturing into the rarefied heights of Service Support. The only monitoring tool of great interest to ITIL processes is an end to end monitor that measures the user experience of a service. Automated event alerting is of benefit, especially by service not CI.
Then there are a whole bunch of monitors and managers and reporters and data stores that come in handy for IT people to do their jobs, but they don't particularly pertain to ITIL process as such. Try to tell the vendors of them though.
By the way, while we are on the topic of
In fact, some vendors struggle with the concept of SLT. A network monitoring tool does not measure the availability SLT unless it can see the availability of the service as experienced by the user at the users end device. Server availability is not service availability.
It seems some vendors (or at least their marketing people) do not understand IT Service Management, or they are counting on their prospects not understanding it.
So, for all you ops software marketers out there, here is ITIL 101:
- Network monitoring is not SLM
- SLT monitoring is not