www.itbusinessedge.com

Login Register

www.itbusinessedge.com

 

www.developer.com

Login Register

www.developer.com

 

www.developer.com

Login Register

www.developer.com

 

www.itbusinessedge.com

Login Register

www.itbusinessedge.com

 
Internet.com logo
IT Professionals
Communications

Database

Enterprise Applications

Hardware

IT Management

IT News

Mobile

Networking

Security

Server

Small Business

Storage

ITManagement
CIO Update

Datamation

Earthweb

Enterprise IT Planet

Intranet Journal

IT Career Planet

IT Channel Planet

ITSM Watch

Project Manager Planet

Developers
Architect

Java / OS

Microsoft Technology

Web Development

Sign in Sign in

http://www.itsmwatch.com/itil/article.php/3754741/Ten-Things-They-Dont-Want-You-to-Know-About-ITIL-v3.htm
Back to Article

By Rob England
Jun 23, 2008

Some time ago, in response to a fairly inane "10 Things You Should Know About ITIL" on the internet, the IT Skeptic posted “10 Other Things You Should Know About ITIL”. To save you looking they were:

 

1.      There is no evidence for ITIL

2.      CMDB can't be done, not practically, not as defined in the blue book

3.      ITIL is the opinion of a select few

4.      There is no public feedback or contribution mechanism for ITIL

5.      ITIL may or may not be "best"

6.      You cannot certify a tool or an organisation in ITIL, only individuals

7.      Formal SLAs may or may not be a healthy way to relate to the business

8.      ITIL tries to be more than it really is: a set of Service Desk practices

9.      ITIL is not public domain, or free

10.     There are a number of alternatives to ITIL, some of which are public domain

 

Continuing the theme, we now have this article. ITIL v3 is only a Refresh. The intention was to clarify the guidance and improve its relevance to business needs today, not to rewrite ITIL. Changing from seven books to five, moving from a process-centric to a service-centric approach, slimming down the core and spinning off content to complementary books, introducing the lifecycle, adding business strategy, peeling off requests from incidents … these things are not a re-write, they are just a "refresh". So, relax.

 

Your certifications under ITIL v2 will still be recognised under v3. Whether they will be the least bit competitive in the job or consulting markets is another question. Right now the job and consulting markets are booming so it won’t be much of an issue until the market starts to contract. Ooh, no, wait, some people think it already is.

 

Two bridging courses are available to allow you to migrate your certifications across: The ITIL Foundation Bridging Certificate In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Foundation to ITIL v3 Foundation), and The ITIL Manager’s Bridge Certification In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Manager to ITIL v3 Diploma). The v3 equivalent of an ITIL Manager is an ITIL Diploma, now called an ITIL Expert, and possibly to be renamed again.

 

All ITIL v3 exams are being developed by APMG, a private for-profit company and the new outsourcers of ITIL certification and trainer accreditation. The governing body advising APMG is mostly made up of the biggest vendors (HP x 2, Pink Elephant, Fox IT, BMC, CA, EMC, IBM, ITpreneurs, Itilics, etc.).

 

ITIL books are published by TSO, a private for-profit company. TSO does very little marketing, relying on itSMF volunteers and other vendors. In fact the ITIL v3 worldwide launch was organised, executed and funded by itSMF with sponsorship that reputedly did not shave significant contribution from TSO. TSO thanked itSMF by undercutting them in book sales to the biggest global organisations.

 

The core is supposed to be “slimmed down” from v2 and more will be put in the complementary books that go around the core. The original intent was that everyone will need the five core books. I suspect pretty much everyone will need one or more, but not all, of the complementary books too, though what is in the complementary set is not clear yet.

 

There will be an online portal at www.itil-live-portal.com (it says so in the Official Introduction on page 150). This may or may not provide the longed-for official ITIL community. It seems to be owned by TSO but there is nothing there yet. No hurry, I guess.

 

The books came out on May 31 2007. Only the books. Only the core books. We are still waiting for the Web portal, a full qualifications scheme, complementary guidance (other than the online glossary, Passing Your Foundation Exam, the pocket Key Element Guides, and a rewrite of Small-Scale ITIL), or the CMDB Federation’s interoperability standard, so you could argue that ITIL v3 isn’t fully out yet.

 

There is no process model for v3. It has been suggested at various times that there would be one, but what has been published so far is nothing of the sort. Boxes and arrows do not make a process model. At a minimum one expects that each of the boxes is a process, with defined inputs, actions and outputs. This is not true of the diagram labelled “process model” in the Official Introduction (p154) or the one on the OGC website (which is administered by APMG).

 

There is no rush. Everyone is getting excited but think about it: complementary books not appearing yet; few are certified in v3 beyond Foundations; nobody experienced in implementing v3 for some time yet.

 

Some time ago, in response to a fairly inane "10 Things You Should Know About ITIL" on the internet, the IT Skeptic posted “10 Other Things You Should Know About ITIL”. To save you looking they were:

 

1.      There is no evidence for ITIL

2.      CMDB can't be done, not practically, not as defined in the blue book

3.      ITIL is the opinion of a select few

4.      There is no public feedback or contribution mechanism for ITIL

5.      ITIL may or may not be "best"

6.      You cannot certify a tool or an organisation in ITIL, only individuals

7.      Formal SLAs may or may not be a healthy way to relate to the business

8.      ITIL tries to be more than it really is: a set of Service Desk practices

9.      ITIL is not public domain, or free

10.     There are a number of alternatives to ITIL, some of which are public domain

 

Continuing the theme, we now have this article. ITIL v3 is only a Refresh. The intention was to clarify the guidance and improve its relevance to business needs today, not to rewrite ITIL. Changing from seven books to five, moving from a process-centric to a service-centric approach, slimming down the core and spinning off content to complementary books, introducing the lifecycle, adding business strategy, peeling off requests from incidents … these things are not a re-write, they are just a "refresh". So, relax.

 

Your certifications under ITIL v2 will still be recognised under v3. Whether they will be the least bit competitive in the job or consulting markets is another question. Right now the job and consulting markets are booming so it won’t be much of an issue until the market starts to contract. Ooh, no, wait, some people think it already is.

 

Two bridging courses are available to allow you to migrate your certifications across: The ITIL Foundation Bridging Certificate In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Foundation to ITIL v3 Foundation), and The ITIL Manager’s Bridge Certification In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Manager to ITIL v3 Diploma). The v3 equivalent of an ITIL Manager is an ITIL Diploma, now called an ITIL Expert, and possibly to be renamed again.

 

All ITIL v3 exams are being developed by APMG, a private for-profit company and the new outsourcers of ITIL certification and trainer accreditation. The governing body advising APMG is mostly made up of the biggest vendors (HP x 2, Pink Elephant, Fox IT, BMC, CA, EMC, IBM, ITpreneurs, Itilics, etc.).

 

ITIL books are published by TSO, a private for-profit company. TSO does very little marketing, relying on itSMF volunteers and other vendors. In fact the ITIL v3 worldwide launch was organised, executed and funded by itSMF with sponsorship that reputedly did not shave significant contribution from TSO. TSO thanked itSMF by undercutting them in book sales to the biggest global organisations.

 

The core is supposed to be “slimmed down” from v2 and more will be put in the complementary books that go around the core. The original intent was that everyone will need the five core books. I suspect pretty much everyone will need one or more, but not all, of the complementary books too, though what is in the complementary set is not clear yet.

 

There will be an online portal at www.itil-live-portal.com (it says so in the Official Introduction on page 150). This may or may not provide the longed-for official ITIL community. It seems to be owned by TSO but there is nothing there yet. No hurry, I guess.

 

The books came out on May 31 2007. Only the books. Only the core books. We are still waiting for the Web portal, a full qualifications scheme, complementary guidance (other than the online glossary, Passing Your Foundation Exam, the pocket Key Element Guides, and a rewrite of Small-Scale ITIL), or the CMDB Federation’s interoperability standard, so you could argue that ITIL v3 isn’t fully out yet.

 

There is no process model for v3. It has been suggested at various times that there would be one, but what has been published so far is nothing of the sort. Boxes and arrows do not make a process model. At a minimum one expects that each of the boxes is a process, with defined inputs, actions and outputs. This is not true of the diagram labelled “process model” in the Official Introduction (p154) or the one on the OGC website (which is administered by APMG).

 

There is no rush. Everyone is getting excited but think about it: complementary books not appearing yet; few are certified in v3 beyond Foundations; nobody experienced in implementing v3 for some time yet.

 


Some time ago, in response to a fairly inane "10 Things You Should Know About ITIL" on the internet, the IT Skeptic posted “10 Other Things You Should Know About ITIL”. To save you looking they were:

 

1.      There is no evidence for ITIL

2.      CMDB can't be done, not practically, not as defined in the blue book

3.      ITIL is the opinion of a select few

4.      There is no public feedback or contribution mechanism for ITIL

5.      ITIL may or may not be "best"

6.      You cannot certify a tool or an organisation in ITIL, only individuals

7.      Formal SLAs may or may not be a healthy way to relate to the business

8.      ITIL tries to be more than it really is: a set of Service Desk practices

9.      ITIL is not public domain, or free

10.     There are a number of alternatives to ITIL, some of which are public domain

 

Continuing the theme, we now have this article. ITIL v3 is only a Refresh. The intention was to clarify the guidance and improve its relevance to business needs today, not to rewrite ITIL. Changing from seven books to five, moving from a process-centric to a service-centric approach, slimming down the core and spinning off content to complementary books, introducing the lifecycle, adding business strategy, peeling off requests from incidents … these things are not a re-write, they are just a "refresh". So, relax.

 

Your certifications under ITIL v2 will still be recognised under v3. Whether they will be the least bit competitive in the job or consulting markets is another question. Right now the job and consulting markets are booming so it won’t be much of an issue until the market starts to contract. Ooh, no, wait, some people think it already is.

 

Two bridging courses are available to allow you to migrate your certifications across: The ITIL Foundation Bridging Certificate In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Foundation to ITIL v3 Foundation), and The ITIL Manager’s Bridge Certification In It Service Management (ITIL v1/v2 Manager to ITIL v3 Diploma). The v3 equivalent of an ITIL Manager is an ITIL Diploma, now called an ITIL Expert, and possibly to be renamed again.

 

All ITIL v3 exams are being developed by APMG, a private for-profit company and the new outsourcers of ITIL certification and trainer accreditation. The governing body advising APMG is mostly made up of the biggest vendors (HP x 2, Pink Elephant, Fox IT, BMC, CA, EMC, IBM, ITpreneurs, Itilics, etc.).

 

ITIL books are published by TSO, a private for-profit company. TSO does very little marketing, relying on itSMF volunteers and other vendors. In fact the ITIL v3 worldwide launch was organised, executed and funded by itSMF with sponsorship that reputedly did not shave significant contribution from TSO. TSO thanked itSMF by undercutting them in book sales to the biggest global organisations.

 

The core is supposed to be “slimmed down” from v2 and more will be put in the complementary books that go around the core. The original intent was that everyone will need the five core books. I suspect pretty much everyone will need one or more, but not all, of the complementary books too, though what is in the complementary set is not clear yet.

 

There will be an online portal at www.itil-live-portal.com (it says so in the Official Introduction on page 150). This may or may not provide the longed-for official ITIL community. It seems to be owned by TSO but there is nothing there yet. No hurry, I guess.

 

The books came out on May 31 2007. Only the books. Only the core books. We are still waiting for the Web portal, a full qualifications scheme, complementary guidance (other than the online glossary, Passing Your Foundation Exam, the pocket Key Element Guides, and a rewrite of Small-Scale ITIL), or the CMDB Federation’s interoperability standard, so you could argue that ITIL v3 isn’t fully out yet.

 

There is no process model for v3. It has been suggested at various times that there would be one, but what has been published so far is nothing of the sort. Boxes and arrows do not make a process model. At a minimum one expects that each of the boxes is a process, with defined inputs, actions and outputs. This is not true of the diagram labelled “process model” in the Official Introduction (p154) or the one on the OGC website (which is administered by APMG).

 

There is no rush. Everyone is getting excited but think about it: complementary books not appearing yet; few are certified in v3 beyond Foundations; nobody experienced in implementing v3 for some time yet.

 


Although the core set of books are supposed to be stable, the complementary set is intended to be revised regularly, and even the core set are intended to have “updates and amendments” (in fact, there has quietly been one already). Do you buy v1 software before the first service pack?

 

ITIL v3 represents “good practice”, i.e. proven generally accepted practice. Except where it isn’t. Parts of v3 are speculative utopian models untested in practice, e.g. Service Knowledge Management System. And other parts are hotly debated, e.g. value networks. These parts look the same as every other part—you need to know.

 

itSMF International now owns a competing complementary body of knowledge called the ITSM Library. Even TSO sell it. There is no guidance as to which one should be used when. Even itSMF was confused enough to initially embargo the publication of the books after buying them. The ITSM Library originates out of the Netherlands, edited by Jan van Bon and published by Van Haren Publishing.

 

OGC is publishing white papers to explain how v3 aligns with ASL, COBIT and ISO20000. The books don’t tell you. The answers are:

 

COBIT: not published yet

 

ISO20000: close but no cigar. The paper plasters over most of the cracks but can’t cover up the lack of Known Error or SKMS in ISO20000.

 

ASL: they don’t. Described as "Living Apart Together". My interpretation: they have divorced but stay in touch occasionally.

 

And no-one tells you how ITIL aligns with the Project Management bodies of knowledge PMBOK and Prince 2, which is pretty important now that ITIL has muscled into Application Management. Service Operation gives Project Management two paragraphs (p165), and not as part of Application Management. Service Transition gives Project Management a couple of paragraphs too, but appears to duplicate all of its functions in the Service Transition plan (p40). Service Design spends more time on it (p31-32) but only vague directions to keep the project honest, not details of how the interface might work between Service Design and Project Management, and never once mentioning PMBOK or Prince 2.

 

Nowhere on or in the five core books, or the Official Introduction, or the Key Element Guides, does it actually say “Version 3”. You are supposed to know.

 

Rob England is an IT industry commentator and consultant, and nascent internet entrepreneur, best known for his blog The IT Skeptic. He lives in a little house in a little village in a little country far away.


 

Sitemap | Contact Us
Terms of Service | Licensing & Permissions | Privacy Policy
About the Developer.com Network | Advertise
Terms of Service | Licensing & Permissions | Privacy Policy
About the IT Business Edge Network | Advertise
Acceptable Use Policy
Terms of Service | Licensing & Permissions | Privacy Policy
About the Developer.com Network | Advertise
Acceptable Use Policy
Terms of Service | Licensing & Permissions | Privacy Policy
About the IT Business Edge Network | Advertise